Comments on: Nuclear Beauty – But deadly http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2008/06/27/nuclear-beauty-but-deadly/ Your Daily Updated Fun, Gadget and Games Blog Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:12:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: tommyrot http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2008/06/27/nuclear-beauty-but-deadly/#comment-25149 tommyrot Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:29:14 +0000 http://www.random-good-stuff.com/?p=4081#comment-25149 Wow - you can tell how far the camera was away by how long it takes sound to reach the camera (18 seconds). What is it - one mile for each five seconds? So the camera was almost four miles away. - at four miles the camera would have been destroyed, wouldn't it? It must have been in an armored structure. Or maybe someone sped up the film, and the camera was really further away.... Wow – you can tell how far the camera was away by how long it takes sound to reach the camera (18 seconds). What is it – one mile for each five seconds? So the camera was almost four miles away. – at four miles the camera would have been destroyed, wouldn’t it? It must have been in an armored structure.

Or maybe someone sped up the film, and the camera was really further away….

]]>