<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shape Illusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2009/02/24/shape-illusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2009/02/24/shape-illusion/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Updated Fun, Gadget and Games Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johcagaorl</title>
		<link>http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2009/02/24/shape-illusion/#comment-31451</link>
		<dc:creator>johcagaorl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2009/02/24/shape-illusion/#comment-31451</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a jastrow illusion. its a very old optical illusion (1889).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jastrow_illusion
http://www.moillusions.com/2006/06/which-one-is-larger-jastrow-illusion.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a jastrow illusion. its a very old optical illusion (1889).<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jastrow_illusion" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jastrow_illusion</a><br />
<a href="http://www.moillusions.com/2006/06/which-one-is-larger-jastrow-illusion.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.moillusions.com/2006/06/which-one-is-larger-jastrow-illusion.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Si</title>
		<link>http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2009/02/24/shape-illusion/#comment-31438</link>
		<dc:creator>Si</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2009/02/24/shape-illusion/#comment-31438</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s real but I think in this case the wide camera lens is exaggerating the size of the closer object, making it seem a bit more impressive than it would to the naked eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s real but I think in this case the wide camera lens is exaggerating the size of the closer object, making it seem a bit more impressive than it would to the naked eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

